Big Four giant EY and its London office managing partner have been hit with a nearly £1.3m fine by the financial watchdog for audit failings related to retailer Made.com in 2021. The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said the sanction follows an investigation into Julie Carlyle, who manages the City office
Rosie Harris-Davison
Tuesday 28 July 2026 8:03 am | Updated: Tuesday 28 July 2026 8:06 am
Big Four giant EY and its London office managing partner have been hit with a nearly £1.3m fine by the financial watchdog for audit failings related to retailer Made.com in 2021.
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said the sanction follows an investigation into Julie Carlyle, who manages the City office and a portfolio of many FTSE-listed retail clients, and the Big Four firm, over the handling of the statutory audit of now-collapsed retailer Made.com.
The FRC has imposed a fine of £1.1m against the firm, and £49,000 against Carlyle. Both sanctions were discounted, as EY and Carlyle admitted the failings to the watchdog soon after they occurred and cooperated with the investigation.
The audit failings specifically concern both Carlyle and EY not adequately performing the procedures required to assess the accuracy and reliability of the retailer‘s management’s financial forecasting models.
The Big Four auditors also failed to gather enough evidence relating to the company’s deferred tax assets in order to confirm these were actually recoverable.
#mc_embed_signup { background: #fff; clear: left; font: 14px Helvetica, Arial,sans-serif; width: 100%; max-width: 600px; margin: 20px 0; } #mc-embedded-subscribe-form { margin: 20px 0 !important; } .newsletter-form-flex { display: flex; gap: 0; align-items: center; margin-top: -10px; } .newsletter-form-flex input[type=”email”] { flex: 1; padding: 2px 10px; border: 1px solid rgb(18, 22, 23) !important; border-radius: 12px 0 0 12px !important; } .newsletter-form-flex input[type=”submit”] { padding: 4px 10px !important; margin: 0 !important; background-color: rgb(18, 22, 23) !important; color: rgb(255, 255, 255) !important; border: 1px solid rgb(18, 22, 23) !important; border-radius: 0 12px 12px 0 !important; } .newsletter-banner-content { margin-bottom: 15px; } .newsletter-banner-content h2 { margin: 0 0 10px 0; font-size: 18px; font-weight: 600; } .newsletter-banner-content p { margin: 0 0 10px 0; line-height: 1.5; } .newsletter-banner-content ul, .newsletter-banner-content ol { margin: 0 0 10px 20px; } .newsletter-banner-content a { color: #0073aa; text-decoration: none; } .newsletter-banner-content a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } .newsletter-banner-content img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; margin: 10px 0; } #mc_embed_signup #mce-success-response { color: #0356a5; display: none; margin: 0 0 10px; width: 100%; } #mc_embed_signup div#mce-responses { float: left; top: -1.4em; padding: 0; overflow: hidden; width: 100%; margin: 0; clear: both; }
Alongside this, the auditors did not consider relevant new evidence that became available between the time the audits were created and the date they signed the final audit report.
This follows the furniture giant, which was listed on the London Stock Exchange until its share value plummeted after it plunged into administration in 2022, following a drop in consumer demand after the Covid pandemic, and was subsequently removed from the market.
Next purchased the company’s intellectual property in December 2022 for £3.4m to sell in their own stores.
“In this case the auditors relied on management’s forecasts without applying sufficient challenge or carrying out adequate testing to obtain sufficient evidence. Absent such challenge and evidence, there is a heightened risk that financial statements present an inaccurate picture of a company’s financial position,” Penrose Foss, executive counsel at the FRC, said.
EY was contacted for comment.
Read more Forvis Mazars and top partner hit with £600,000 fine for audit failings
Similarly tagged content: Sections Categories People & Organisations Related Topics
